• Calving

Optimise performance with a commercial transition programme

  • Calving

For over 50 years, scientific and on-farm case studies have supported the importance of a well-executed transition period (three weeks before and after calving) on overall performance.

More recently, cow-wearable technologies have given us a better understanding of why this period is critical to overall performance. A study in 2016 published in the Journal of Dairy Science showed how rumination and feeding behaviours differ between healthy and sick dairy cows during the transition period1.

It showed that cows with subclinical ketosis (SCK) spent less time ruminating during pre-calving. Compared with healthy cows, those with SCK and metritis had lower dry matter intake during the pre-calving period and ate less until day 14 and day 20 post calving, respectively.

Nowadays, the same cow-wearable technologies are on many New Zealand farms and have allowed the interpretation of large data sets, leading to advice on best managing cows post-calving for optimal production and reproductive outcomes. However, much of this analysis is done in hindsight reducing the opportunity to prevent the issues from occurring in the first place. Fortunately, one of the easiest ways to improve rumination and feeding behaviour in the transition period is to introduce a commercially formulated transition product such as NutriMin® Springer Cow Balancer.

An independent study by Dairy Australia2 showed that when using commercially available transition products such as NutriMin Springer Cow Balancer pre-calving, cows experienced 30% less subclinical milk fever, 5% less subclinical ketosis and 5% less retained membranes than those receiving no transition products.

A more recent on-farm case study carried out on a North Canterbury farm by technical expert in ruminant nutrition Dr Laura Pattie showed the cost benefits of the NutriMin Springer Cow Balancer program. These figures show the significant financial and animal health benefits of implementing a transition program pre-calving and the improvement in 6 weeks in-calf rates (see table 1).

In addition to a well-planned pre-calving program, post-calving protocols such as drenching at-risk cows or cows with a non-specific health alert with 1 Litre of JumpStart™ can help stimulate appetite and significantly reduce the time taken for rumination to bounce back post-calving (reducing the time spent in negative energy balance).

Proactively managing the transition period (pre-and post-calving) will result in better rumination and feeding behaviour by preventing metabolic diseases such as clinical and subclinical milk fever.

Fortunately, you don't have to have cow-wearable technologies to improve your metabolic, production, and reproductive performance, but you do need sound nutrition advice.

Contact your Farm Source Representative for more information on how to book a free transition consultation with one of the Nutritech field team.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 1. Comparison of before and after implementing the NutriMin Springer Cow programme

  Spring 2019 Spring 2020 Differences
Herd size 920 930  
Deaths from milk fever 8 (0.9%) 0 (0%) - 8 cows
Cow replacement value $1800 $1800  
Clinical cases of milk fever 77 (8.3%) 13 (1.4%) - 64 cases
Milk price ($/kgMS) $6.50 $6.50  
Average production (kgMS/cow/year) 475 475  
Total losses from deaths
(Cow value + Lost production)
$39,100 $0 SAVING
$39,100
Total cost from clinical cases
(excl. labour)
$33,136 $5,594 SAVING
$27,541
Estimated cost of prevention - NutriMin® Springer Cow Balancer   $10,624  
Other Improvements
Metricure Treatments:
85 less treatments (2019 140 cows treated, 15% of the herd; 2020 55 cows treated, 6% of the herd)
Six week in-calf rate improved by 3%
Total Savings - $165,649 - Cost of Prevention
$10,624
TOTAL SAVING
$155,025

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Article supplied by Nutritech.

1 Rumination and feeding behaviors differ between healthy and sick dairy cows during the transition period. K. Schirmann et al. J. Dairy Sci. 99:9917-9924.
2 Dairy Australia guide to transition feeding 2010.